I am disappointed to have to report that once again metal prices remained low during the year, especially in the case of zinc, and the company has continued to concentrate its efforts on conserving resources in anticipation of the long expected improvement in prices.
Parys Mountain
The company holds an important geological resource at Parys Mountain which has been identified and described in independent geological reports. This deposit is beyond and separate from the historic mine workings and contains a total of 6.5 million tonnes with a combined average grade for zinc, copper and lead of over 10%. There are also estimated to be 60,000 ounces of gold and 250 tonnes (8,000,000 ounces) of silver in this resource.
During the past year work commenced to dewater the higher levels of the historic mine workings at Parys Mountain. A Project Group including the Amlwch Industrial Heritage Trust, the company, Anglesey County Council, the Environment Agency and other interested parties had been set up to consider the condition of an underground concrete plug in an old drainage adit. This Group concluded that the old workings should be dewatered and the plug removed. The work, which has been undertaken by Anglesey County Council and funded by the Council and the Welsh Development Agency, is expected to significantly improve water quality to the south of the Mountain. Discharge of the water is now complete and the plug has been removed.
This dewatering will also provide access to hitherto inaccessible areas of the old underground mine and enable new studies to be conducted which could help towards a better geological understanding of the total Parys Mountain area. Whilst the old workings are separate from the polymetallic geological resource described above, they are adjacent and parallel to a significant unmined deposit, the Northern Copper Zone, which lies to the north of the old workings and which was extensively explored by major mining companies, including Noranda in the 1960s and 70s. At that time it was reported that the Northern Copper Zone contained 36,000,000 tonnes at an average grade of 0.66% copper. It apparently was not assayed for gold. When funding permits, the company plans to re-examine the potential of the Northern Copper Zone as well as the prospective area deeper than and to the west of the White Rock zone referred to in earlier reports and to carry out further drilling closer to its identified resources.
Financial results
The loss for the year was £121,299 before an exceptional item compared with a loss of £106,078 for last year. As a result of continued low metal prices, combined this year with a deterioration in the foreign exchange rate, a further impairment provision (in accordance with FRS 11) of £2 million against the value of the Parys Mountain property has been provided this year (last year £2.2 million was provided). I would like to stress that this provision does not diminish the directors positive view of the long-term potential of the property.
In order to better structure the companys activities and property holdings, and facilitate future development, all the mineral rights required for the operation of the Parys property have been transferred during the year from Anglesey Mining plc to Parys Mountain Mines (UK) Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary, together with the relevant accumulated expenditures and provisions.
Outlook - Zinc Prices
Sixty per cent of revenues in the early years of the Parys mine are projected to come from zinc. The average zinc price for 2002 was US$0.35 per pound which was well below the average zinc price during the 1990s of US$0.48 per pound. Low zinc prices reflect high inventories of zinc in LME warehouses, primarily as a result of export of metal production from China and new mine production, chiefly from Antamina in Peru and Century in Australia. However, metal inventories appear to have peaked and to be set for a decline due to concentrate shortfalls as a result of mine shut downs. Concentrate inventories were drawn down in 2002 and the shortfall of concentrates is expected to increase in 2003 and 2004 as mine production declines due to temporary and permanent mine closures whilst smelter capacity expands.
In the first half of 2003 the zinc price averaged US$0.35 per pound and is showing a upward improving trend in the range of US$0.36 to US$0.37 per pound. Forecasts are for a 3.9% growth in world zinc consumption in 2003 (International Lead Zinc Study Group, April 2003). These prices are still well below the base of the long term price and are not considered to be sustainable. The recent weakening of the US dollar in the first half of 2003 will lead to a rise in the cost base of most zinc producers, especially those in Australia, Ireland and Canada.
Given the need for higher zinc prices to finance development of known deposits, including Parys Mountain, and to make new exploration discoveries, mine zinc supply shortfalls will result in a large supply gap which is expected to develop by 2005. This in turn will lead to upward pressure on zinc prices which should be most beneficial to Parys Mountain.
John F. Kearney
Chairman
17 September 2003
Location
The Parys Mountain property is located in the northern part of the island of Anglesey in north Wales. The mineral property is about 3 kilometres in length and covers more than 2 square kilometres. The company holds the freehold, including the mineral rights, to about half of this area. The other half, formerly leased, is subject to negotiation of an agreement over lease payments. The company also has a mining lease from the Crown for gold and silver over a wider area.
The property is located 2 miles south of the town of Amlwch. The port of Holyhead is 18 miles to the west. Access to the property is excellent by road, rail and sea. All necessary services and resources including power, engineering, maintenance facilities and a skilled labour force are located nearby.
History
Parys Mountain has been the site of mining activity at various times since the Bronze age. During the 1780s Parys Mountain was believed to be the largest copper mine in the world. Open pit and underground mining were carried out over a strike length of more than 3 kilometres and to depths of about 200 metres, the deepest then achievable by known technologies. Almost all activities ceased by the beginning of the 20th century.
In the 1960s the search for a new mine at Parys Mountain commenced. Exploration in the 1960s and 1970s was focused on the extension of the old open pit workings and was directed towards copper. This exploration utilised a variety of geological, geophysical and geochemical methods together with approximately 285 diamond drill holes totalling about 60,000 metres of drilling. A resource of 36 million tonnes containing about 250,000 tonnes of copper metal (the Northern Copper zone) was identified at depth, however this is regarded as being too low a grade to mine economically unless combined with other deposits.
The modern phase of exploration of Parys Mountain began in the early 1980s when a new important polymetallic zinc, copper, lead, silver and gold area was identified about 1 kilometre west of and totally separate from the old workings. Between 1988 and 1990 a production shaft was sunk in this western area to a depth of 300 metres and 1,000 metres of lateral development were completed on the 280 metre level. Drilling and underground development work from 1988 to 1990 resulted in the identification of the Engine, White Rock and Chapel zones containing a resource of 6.5 million tonnes with a combined base metal (zinc, copper and lead) grade of 10.3%.
Approximately 2,000 tonnes of development ore were hoisted and successfully processed through a pilot plant constructed on the site for metallurgical testing; the concentrate production of about 200 tonnes was sold to the smelter at Avonmouth.
Feasibility study
In 1990 Kilborn Engineering completed an independent feasibility study of the project that confirmed the technical and economic viability of a 1,000 tonnes per day (300,000 tonnes per year) mining and milling operation producing zinc, copper, lead and gold concentrates. Kilborn estimated the capital cost of the mine at £22 million. This study was based on a mineable reserve of 1,963,000 tonnes at a grade of 6.43% zinc, 1.30% copper, 3.32% lead, 75 grams of silver and 0.51 grams of gold per tonne and a mine life of seven years. This mineable reserve is in the shaft development area, being only a portion of the identified geological resource of 6.5 million tonnes.
Detailed mine and plant designs were prepared and planning permission obtained. At the same time an environmental protection programme was devised also giving attention to historical and archaeological concerns. Declining metal prices and weakening stock markets in 1991 and 1992 resulted in development of the project being placed on hold. The property has been maintained on a care and maintenance basis since that time.
Reassessment
Geological studies carried out over the past few years have identified new areas, including a possible new zone, with significant exploration potential. An extensive geological reassessment of the property was conducted between 1995 and 2000; this has resulted in the development of new geological models which indicate that there is potential for the discovery of substantial additional mineral resources in largely unexplored areas to the north, west and east of the established resource. All this work has considerably improved the understanding of the stratigraphic and structural settings of various mineralised zones and significantly enhanced the potential for discovery of further mineralisation.
Old workings dewatered
During 2003 the upper levels of the historic mine workings at Parys Mountain were dewatered and an underground concrete plug removed to facilitate natural drainage of the old workings to the north of the mountain. This should reduce any flood risk and significantly improve water quality to the south. The dewatering will also provide access to hitherto inaccessible areas of the old underground mine and enable new studies to be conducted which could help towards a better geological understanding of the total Parys Mountain area.
Exploration potential
The potential for the discovery of additional mineral resources in previously largely untested areas of the Parys Mountain property is very significant.
The Engine zone, which is the principal host of the known reserves, has seen little exploration beyond the immediate area of the shaft. Further exploration of the Engine Zone is planned for the northern and north eastern parts of the property which have been largely unexplored to date and where widely scattered massive sulphide intersections demonstrate considerable exploration potential.
In a separate area a potential new zone of disseminated/semi-massive mineralisation has been identified at depth, down-dip from the White Rock Zone, along the western boundary of the volcanic complex, where the potential for continuation of mineralisation is considered excellent. The upper part of this possible new zone lies at a reasonable depth, within close proximity to the existing shaft and within reach of the present underground development.
The results of the geological reassessment and various studies carried out over recent years demonstrate clearly that the Parys Mountain property has strong similarities with other major volcanogenic massive sulphide (VMS) deposits elsewhere in the world and that the property has the potential for new discoveries which would make Parys Mountain comparable to other major volcanogenic hosted polymetallic deposits which are substantial sources of zinc, copper, lead, gold and silver.
Whilst the old workings now exposed by the drainage referred to above are separate from the Engine, White Rock and Chapel polymetallic zones, they are adjacent to the Northern Copper Zone which lies immediately to the north of the old workings. The Northern Copper Zone was extensively explored by major mining companies, including Noranda, in the 1960s and 1970s. At that time it was reported that the Northern Copper Zone contained a large resource of 36 million tonnes at an average grade of 0.66% copper, containing about 250,000 tonnes of copper metal.
The Northern Copper Zone was regarded at the time as being too low grade to mine economically, unless combined with other deposits, however the drill intersections apparently were never assayed for gold. Nevertheless the mineralisation at Parys Mountain is now known to usually contain gold although at a relatively low grade. The gold grade of the 6.5 million tonne polymetallic resource is estimated to be 0.32 grams per tonne, equivalent to 60,000 contained ounces of gold. If it can be demonstrated that the Northern Copper Zone contains even low grade gold it might have a meaningful impact on the potential of that deposit.
It is planned to re-examine the potential of the Northern Copper Zone as well as to undertake a major drilling programme to explore new exploration targets related to the Engine zones which have the potential to transform Parys Mountain into a very significant mineral deposit. Such a drilling programme would be one of the most comprehensive ever undertaken on the property. It would take at least one year to complete and is budgeted to cost about £500,000. However the programme cannot commence until appropriate financing is available.
The directors have pleasure in submitting their report and the audited accounts for the year ended 31 March 2003.
The principal activity during the year was the maintenance and development of the Parys Mountain property. Operations at the Dolaucothi gold property in south Wales are suspended. Other mineral development opportunities continue to be evaluated.
The loss for the year before taxation was £2,121,299 (2002 - £2,306,078). The group has no revenues from the operation of its properties. The loss comprises interest and administrative expenses together with an impairment provision of £2,000,000 (2002 - £2,200,000) (see below) and evaluation costs not related to Parys Mountain which, in accordance with the groups accounting policy, are charged to the profit and loss account. Included in the loss was £72,178 (2002 -£69,707) in respect of interest due. £51,260 (2002 - £38,822) was expended on corporate costs, administration expenses and the investigation and evaluation of exploration and development opportunities. This expenditure has risen in comparison with last year because of increased project evaluation activity.
The impairment provision of £2,000,000 (2002 - £2,200,000) arises following a review by the directors of the net value at which the accumulated development costs of Parys Mountain should be carried in the accounts. The provision was determined following calculations of discounted estimated future real cash flows on the basis of current estimates of proven and probable reserves and capital and operating costs, together with directors estimates of future metal prices and foreign currency exchange rates and in accordance with the provisions of FRS 11. Further details of the valuation of intangible assets are to be found in note 8.
During the year fixed assets of £2,000 (2002 - nil) were acquired, £61,422 (2002 - £73,687) was capitalised in respect of the development of the Parys Mountain property and £500 (2002 - £1,638) was capitalised in respect of the Dolaucothi property.
At a time when base metal prices remain low, the group has continued to restrict many activities in order to conserve its finances. Juno Limited, the companys major shareholder has continued to provide funding for the companys routine expenses under a working capital agreement.
During the year work commenced to dewater the higher levels of the historic mine workings at Parys Mountain. The work, which was undertaken by Anglesey County Council and funded by the Council and the Welsh Development Agency, is expected to significantly improve water quality to the south of the Mountain and to remove a flood risk to the north.
The group has no revenues and the directors are unable to recommend a dividend. Since the date of the accounts the activities of the group have continued in accordance with the directors' expectations. The directors remain attentive for opportunities to be involved in appropriate new mineral ventures.
In order to better structure the companys activities and property holdings and facilitate future development, it was decided that the Parys property should be held in a dedicated subsidiary company rather than by Anglesey Mining plc. To this end all the mineral rights required for the operation of the property in accordance with the Feasibility Study and the companys subsequent plans, have been transferred to Parys Mountain Mines (UK) Limited during the year. The relevant accumulated expenditures and impairment provisions were also transferred. These transfers have no effect on the consolidated accounts of the group. It is expected that the freehold of the Parys property will also be transferred to a subsidiary company in due course.
The names of directors with biographical details are shown on the inside rear cover. There have been no changes in the year. In accordance with the articles of association, Howard Miller and David Lean retire by rotation and, being eligible, offer themselves for re-election.
Juno Limited (Juno) which is registered in Bermuda is the ultimate parent company. The company has a controlling shareholder agreement with Juno dated September 1996 and a consolidated working capital agreement with Juno of 12 June 2002. Apart from working capital advances and related interest charges there were no transactions between the group and Juno or its group during the year. An independent committee reviews and approves all transactions and potential transactions with Juno. Danesh Varma is a director and, through his family interests, a significant shareholder of Juno. John Kearney is a director and shareholder of Minco plc, in which Juno holds an interest of approximately 17%.
There are no other contracts of significance in which any director has or had during the year a material interest.
The interests at 31 March 2003 of the directors and their families in the share capital of the company, all of which are beneficial, are set out below. The holdings are expressed as a percentage of 116,241,384 (2002 116,241,384) ordinary shares, this being the number of ordinary shares in issue at 8 September 2003.
At 31 March 2003 At 31 March 2002
Director |
Number of options |
Number of ordinary shares |
% of issued ordinary shares |
Number of options |
Number of ordinary shares |
% of issued ordinary shares |
|
John Kearney |
1,960,000 |
- |
1.7 |
1,960,000 |
- |
1.7 |
|
Ian Cuthbertson |
500,000 |
602,300 |
1.0 |
600,000 |
500,000 |
1.0 |
|
David Lean |
300,000 |
- |
0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
|
Howard Miller |
300,000 |
- |
0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
|
Danesh Varma |
300,000 |
- |
0.3 |
300,000 |
- |
0.3 |
|
The directors are required by company law to prepare accounts for each financial year that give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the company and the group as at the end of the financial year and of the profit or loss for that period.
The directors confirm that suitable accounting policies have been used and applied consistently, and that reasonable and prudent judgements and estimates have been made in the preparation of these accounts. The directors also confirm that applicable accounting standards have been followed and that the financial statements have been prepared on the going concern basis.
The directors have responsibility for ensuring that the group keeps proper accounting records which disclose with reasonable accuracy the financial position of the group and which enable them to ensure that the financial statements comply with the Companies Act 1985. They are also responsible for the systems of internal financial controls and for safeguarding the assets of the company and the group and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.
Further definition of the distinction of responsibilities between directors and auditors is to be found in the auditors report.
At 8 September 2003 the following shareholders had advised the company of an interest in the issued ordinary share capital of the company.
Name |
Number of shares |
Percentage of share capital |
Juno Limited |
57,924,248 |
49.8 |
Golden Prospect plc |
4,000,000 |
3.4 |
The company is aware of a holding of 8,750,000 shares (7.5%) in the name of FGL Asset Management Limited, a Hong Kong based nominee account, which is said to be held on behalf of clients none of whom have a beneficial interest in more than 3% of the issued ordinary share capital of the company. So far as the company is aware there are no other interests of more than 3% in the ordinary share capital of the company.
In the light of the companys limited financial resources and the requirement to raise further funds, the directors wish to have a larger than usual number of shares available for issue. Although the directors would usually wish to allot any new share capital on a pre-emptive basis, they believe that it is appropriate to have a larger amount available for issue at their discretion without pre-emption than is usually the case for other listed companies. Accordingly a resolution will be put to the AGM to renew the directors' authority to allot equity securities for cash without pre-emption. In the case of allotments other than for rights or other pre-emptive issues, it is proposed that such authority will be for up to £290,000 or 29,000,000 ordinary shares which is equivalent to 25% of the issued ordinary share capital at 8 September 2003. Whilst such authority is significantly in excess of the 5% of existing issued ordinary share capital which is normal for listed companies, it will provide additional flexibility which the directors believe is in the best interests of the company in its present circumstances.
In August 1997 the freehold of the western part of Parys Mountain was purchased by the company. Obtaining a meaningful value for this land is difficult, especially given its historical use and that the companys pre-existing interest in the mineral rights would also have to be taken into account. The land is carried in the accounts at its cost to the company of £120,000. In the opinion of the directors, the market value of this land is unlikely to be significantly less than this figure.
The group conducts its business on the normal trade credit terms of each of its suppliers and tries to ensure that suppliers are paid in accordance with those terms. The groups average creditor payment period at 31 March 2003 was 70 days (2002 - 42 days).
The group made no contributions during the year (2002 - nil).
The group is an equal opportunity employer in all respects.
Deloitte & Touche have indicated their willingness to continue in office and a resolution to re-appoint them and to authorise the directors to fix their remuneration will be proposed at the annual general meeting.
By order of the board
Ian Cuthbertson
Company Secretary
17 September 2003
Unaudited information:
The remuneration committee is comprised of Howard Miller (chairman) and Danesh Varma. No remuneration consultants were employed during the year.
The boards aim, implemented by the committee, with regard to executive and non-executive directors remuneration is to provide a package which will attract, retain and motivate directors of the calibre required and be consistent with the groups limited ability to pay directors in cash. Consequently share options form a major part of the executive directors remuneration and all of the non-executive directors remuneration.
There are no directors service contracts and, except in the case of Ian Cuthbertson, no arrangements in force whereby the group is under an obligation to pay fees, salaries, pensions or any other remuneration to any of the directors.
All directors and employees are eligible to receive options. In determining the amount of options to be granted to each individual, the directors take into account the need for and value of his services, the amount of time he spends on the business of the group and any other remuneration receivable by him from the group.
In respect of those share options marked with an asterisk in the table overleaf, there are performance criteria to be met, namely that the companys share price performance over the period from grant to exercise must exceed that of the companies in the top quartile of the FTSE 100 index. This index was selected as being an easily available benchmark of general corporate performance. There are no performance criteria to be met in respect of other share options, since these were awarded at a time when performance conditions were not generally applied to share options. Each grant of an option was made at a cost to the participant of £1.
This graph shows the total shareholder return over a five year period for the company and for the FTSE Allshare Mining index, being the most appropriate comparative available for the company covering the past five years.

The total directors remuneration amounted to £25,721 (2002 - £16,505) comprising salary £24,666 (2002 - £15,575), benefits £125 (2002 - nil) and pension contributions £930 (2002 - £930).
2003 2002
Name |
Salary and fees £ |
Benefits |
Pension |
Total |
Salary and fees £ |
Benefits |
Pension |
Total |
Executive |
||||||||
John Kearney |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
Ian Cuthbertson |
24,666 |
125 |
930 |
25,721 |
15,575 |
- |
930 |
16,505 |
Non-executive |
||||||||
Howard Miller |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
David Lean |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
Danesh Varma |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
Totals |
24,666 |
125 |
930 |
25,721 |
15.575 |
- |
930 |
16,505 |
Pension contributions are to a money purchase pension scheme. Benefits are in respect of the provision of a van.
Details of each share option held (all of them beneficial) by all those who were directors at the beginning of the year are set out below. There have been no options exercised during the year. All options are over ordinary shares of 1 pence each.
Name |
Options at 1 April 2002 |
Lapsed in year |
Granted in year |
Options at 31 March 2003 |
Exercise price |
Date from which exercisable |
Expiry date |
John Kearney* |
1,960,000 |
1,960,000 |
5p |
23 Oct 96 |
22 Oct 03 |
||
Ian Cuthbertson |
400,000 |
400,000 |
- |
5p |
30 Nov 95 |
30 Nov 02 |
|
Ian Cuthbertson |
200,000 |
200,000 |
5p |
23 Oct 96 |
22 Oct 06 |
||
Ian Cuthbertson* |
- |
300,000 |
300,000 |
2p |
3 May 05 |
2 May 12 |
|
Howard Miller* |
- |
300,000 |
300,000 |
2p |
3 May 02 |
2 May 09 |
|
David Lean* |
- |
300,000 |
300,000 |
2p |
3 May 02 |
2 May 09 |
|
Danesh Varma* |
300,000 |
300,000 |
5p |
23 Oct 96 |
22 Oct 03 |
*Performance condition applies.
Certain of these options expire on 22 October 2003. The board intends to replace these options upon their expiry and to grant further options on a specific and individual basis, the companys former share option schemes now having expired.
The market price of the ordinary shares at 31 March 2003 was 1.88 pence, the high for the year to 31 March 2003 was 2.00 pence and the low for the year was 0.5 pence. The mid-market price at 8 September 2003 was 2.38 pence.
By order of the board
Ian Cuthbertson
Company Secretary
17 September 2003
The board regularly considers its policies and practices in relation to corporate governance in the light of the Combined Code on Corporate Governance appended to the Listing Rules issued by the Financial Services Authority.
The board supports the highest standards in corporate governance and endeavours to implement the principles of the Combined Code in such a manner as not to hinder the development of the group. This is perhaps harder in a small group than in the larger organisations with which the Combined Code is chiefly concerned.
Throughout the year the group has been in compliance with the Code provisions set out in section 1 of the Combined Code on Corporate Governance issued by the Financial Services Authority, except as set out below:
· The board meets when required and not on a fixed schedule.
· There is no formal nomination committee for appointment of new directors.
· There is no formal schedule of matters reserved for the board, since the board deals with all matters of substance.
·
The directors were not appointed for specific terms but are
subject to retirement from the
board by rotation at annual general meetings at intervals of no more than three years.
During the year the board was comprised of two executive directors and three non-executive directors. Howard Miller is the senior independent non-executive director for the purposes of the Combined Code. The audit committee comprises Danesh Varma and David Lean. The remuneration committee comprises Howard Miller and Danesh Varma.
John Kearney is the chairman and chief executive. In the light of the size and activity level of the group, the board believes that combining these roles is entirely appropriate for the group at present. The companys strategy is determined by the whole board.
There is an established procedure by which directors may, at the companys expense, take independent advice in the furtherance of their duties.
The board of directors is responsible for and annually reviews the groups systems of internal control, financial and otherwise. Such systems provide reasonable and not absolute assurance of the safeguarding of assets, the maintenance of proper accounting records and the reliability of financial information. The key feature of the group's financial control system is that board members directly monitor all payments and transactions as well as budgets and annual accounts. The board considers it inappropriate because of the companys limited operations to establish an internal audit function at present, however this decision is reviewed annually.
In reviewing the other risks facing the company, the board is sufficiently close to the companys operations and aware of its activities to be able to adequately monitor risk without the establishment of any formal process. The company may become subject to risks against which it cannot insure or against which it may elect not to insure because of high premium costs or other reasons. The board believes the significant risks facing the company are adequately disclosed in these financial statements and that there are no other risks of comparable magnitude which need to be disclosed.
We have audited the financial statements of Anglesey Mining plc for the year ended 31 March 2003 which comprise the consolidated profit and loss account, the balance sheets, the consolidated cash flow statement and the related notes 1 to 26. These financial statements have been prepared under the accounting policies set out therein. We have also audited the information in the part of the directors remuneration report that is described as having been audited.
This report is made solely to the company's members, as a body, in accordance with Section 235 of the Companies Act 1985. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the company's members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditors' report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the company and the company's members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.
Respective responsibilities of directors and auditors
As described in the statement of directors' responsibilities, the company's directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements in accordance with applicable United Kingdom law and accounting standards. They are also responsible for the other information contained in the annual report including the directors remuneration report. Our responsibility is to audit the financial statements and the part of the directors remuneration report described as having been audited in accordance with relevant United Kingdom legal and regulatory requirements and auditing standards.
We report to you our opinion as to whether the financial statements give a true and fair view and whether the financial statements and the part of the directors remuneration report described as having been audited are properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 1985. We also report if, in our opinion, the directors report is not consistent with the financial statements and the part of the directors remuneration report described as having been audited, if the company has not kept proper accounting records, if we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit, or if information specified by law regarding directors remuneration and transactions with the company and other members of the group is not disclosed.
We review whether the corporate governance statement reflects the company's compliance with the seven provisions of the Combined Code specified for our review by the Listing Rules of the Financial Services Authority and we report if it does not. We are not required to consider whether the board's statements on internal control cover all risks and controls, or form an opinion on the effectiveness of the group's corporate governance procedures or its risk and control procedures.
We read the directors report and the other information contained in the annual report for the above year as described in the contents section including the unaudited part of the directors remuneration report and consider the implications for our report if we become aware of any apparent misstatements or material inconsistencies with the financial statements. Our responsibilities do not extend to any other information.
Basis of audit opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with United Kingdom auditing standards issued by the Auditing Practices Board. An audit includes examination, on a test basis, of evidence relevant to the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. It also includes an assessment of the significant estimates and judgements made by the directors in the preparation of the financial statements and of whether the accounting policies are appropriate to the companys circumstances, consistently applied and adequately disclosed.
We planned and performed our audit so as to obtain all the information and explanations which we considered necessary in order to provide us with sufficient evidence to give reasonable assurance that the financial statements and the part of the directors remuneration report described as having been audited are free from material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or other irregularity or error. In forming our opinion, we also evaluated the overall adequacy of the presentation of information in the financial statements and the part of the directors remuneration report described as having been audited.
Fundamental uncertainties
In forming our opinion we have considered the adequacy of the disclosures in the financial statements concerning the basis of preparation and the recoverability of development costs.
The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, the validity of which depends on:
· the groups ability to continue its operations;
· the raising of new finance to develop the mine;
· the viability of the operation of the mine; and
· the ability of the group to trade profitably in the future.
The financial statements do not include any adjustments that would result, should the above conditions not be met. Details of the circumstances relating to this fundamental uncertainty are described in note 1 to the financial statements.
The financial statements disclose the directors' assumption that the development costs included in intangible fixed assets in the consolidated balance sheet at £5,156,609 (2002 - £7,094,687) and that investments totalling £5,038,060 (2002 £188,640) and developments costs included in intangible assets in 2002 at £6,902,122 and included in the company balance sheet will be recovered by the operation of the mine. The validity of this assumption depends upon the viability of the operation of the mine, the ability of the group to raise the funding referred to above and the ability of the group to trade profitably in the future. Details of the circumstances relating to this fundamental uncertainty are described in notes 8 and 10 to the financial statements. Our opinion is not qualified in respect of the above fundamental uncertainties.
Opinion
In our opinion, the financial statements give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the company and the group as at 31 March 2003 and of the loss of the group for the year then ended and have been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 1985.

The financial statements on pages 13 to
23 were approved by the board of
directors on 17 September 2003 and were signed on its behalf by :
John F. Kearney, Chairman
Ian Cuthbertson, Finance Director

The group has no recognised gains or losses other than the losses shown above and therefore no separate statement of total recognised gains and losses has been presented.
There is no difference between the loss on ordinary activities before taxation and the retained loss for the year stated above, and their historical cost equivalents.

The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with applicable accounting standards generally accepted in the United Kingdom and with the Companies Act 1985.
The financial statements are prepared under the historical cost convention.
The financial statements are prepared on a going concern basis. The validity of the going concern concept is dependent on finance being available for the continuing working capital requirements of the group and finance for the development of the Parys Mountain property eventually becoming available. Based on the assumptions that such finance will become available, the directors believe that the going concern basis is appropriate for these accounts. Should the going concern basis not be appropriate, adjustments would have to be made to reduce the value of the group's assets, in particular the intangible fixed assets, to their realisable values.
The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the parent company and its subsidiaries made up to the end of the financial year. Where a subsidiary is acquired or disposed of during the financial year, the consolidated financial statements include the attributable profit from or to the date of acquisition or disposal.
The groups freehold property is stated in the balance sheet at cost. The directors consider that the useful life of the premises is so long and their estimated residual value, based on prices prevailing at the date of acquisition, is such that any depreciation would not be material. The carrying value is reviewed annually and any impairment in value would be charged immediately to the profit and loss account.
Plant, equipment, fixtures, fittings and motor vehicles are stated in the balance sheet at cost, less depreciation. Depreciation is charged on a straight line basis at the following annual rates: - plant and equipment - 25%; fixtures and fittings - 20%; motor vehicles - 25%.
Intangible fixed assets are stated in the balance sheet at cost, less amounts written off and provisions for impairment.
The group follows the method of accounting for its mineral properties whereby all costs related to acquisition, exploration and development, including associated technical and specific administrative expenses, are capitalised by property. No gains or losses are recognised on the sale of mineral properties except when there is a material disposition of reserves. All other proceeds are credited against the cost of the related property. On the commencement of commercial production, net costs are charged to operations on the unit-of-production method by property, based upon estimated recoverable reserves.
Mineral properties are written down when an impairment in their value has occurred and are written off when abandoned. Where a provision is made it is dealt with in the profit and loss account in the period in which it arises.
Profit and loss account transactions in foreign currencies are translated at the rates of exchange ruling at the date of the transaction, or where forward currency contracts have been arranged, at the contracted rates.
All foreign exchange differences arising on transactions in the year are taken to the profit and loss account in the year in which they arise.
Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into sterling at the rates of exchange ruling at the end of the financial year or at a contracted rate if ap